|
Post by Hope on Feb 22, 2022 15:28:44 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mew1987 on Feb 28, 2022 7:47:57 GMT
I had a theory on another post that the bent steak knife could've been used in the wall do you think that is at all possible
|
|
camfaults
Full Member
Historian, researcher, writer; major focus on cold cases of California
Posts: 151
|
Post by camfaults on Feb 28, 2022 8:27:30 GMT
Yes. Perhaps one of the assailants was using it to intimidate a victim. It would be interesting if the knife holes in the wall could be compared with the knives at the crime scene. I've always wondered if those holes were made during the crime or at another time by a different tenant. I'm still making my way through the reports, but was there ever any mentions of possible knife holes in the floor of the living room? In the crime scene photos available online, the carpet appears to be the thin indoor/outdoor type without a pad between it and the wood floorboards. If there was even one knife hole in the floor that would lend to the argument that perhaps an assailant wielded the steak knife to stab a victim, the victim moved resulting in the assailant plunging the knife into the carpet and wood floor, hence, the bent steak knife. It also would be worth knowing what Sue generally used the steak knife for (cutting meat, peeling vegetables or apples, pop tops off of cans or bottles). Could the knife had already been out, on one of the tables in the living room, and it was grabbed by a victim or assailant for a weapon?
|
|
|
Post by mew1987 on Feb 28, 2022 12:16:38 GMT
Some interesting points made there the floor never crossed my mind probably because it’s always been pointed out that there were holes in the wall
if the steak knife was used for opening cans or bottles Johnny or Dana could’ve been using it at the time but this brings back the question brought up about the toxicology reports
Has it ever been said who lived there before the Sharps and if they were involved in any crimes
|
|
brick
New Member
Posts: 16
|
Post by brick on Feb 28, 2022 20:18:41 GMT
That steak knife bent because it was cheap and not at all strong. Yet you have people stabbing walls and opening cans with the same knife that bent when Rick and Justin were forced to stab Johnny's dead body?
Really?
What about the missing knife used to stab Sue? No weapon left at the staged crime scene comes close to being used to kill Sue. That's the knife you're looking for. That's the knife Marty used to kill Sue and the same knife Marty threw into the walls many times.
Is there anyone here worth taking seriously?
|
|
|
Post by mew1987 on Mar 1, 2022 0:30:06 GMT
That steak knife bent because it was cheap and not at all strong. Yet you have people stabbing walls and opening cans with the same knife that bent when Rick and Justin were forced to stab Johnny's dead body? Really? What about the missing knife used to stab Sue? No weapon left at the staged crime scene comes close to being used to kill Sue. That's the knife you're looking for. That's the knife Marty used to kill Sue and the same knife Marty threw into the walls many times. Is there anyone here worth taking seriously? And welcome back Dmac
|
|
|
Post by Hope on Mar 1, 2022 4:46:40 GMT
Oh great, more dmac-says-sos. Dmac says a knife is missing. Dmac says none of the knives killed Sue. Dmac says his missing knife was used by Marty to kill Sue. Dmac says the knife couldn't have bent in the wall even though there are knife marks in the wall. Dmac says little boys bent the knife while being force to participate. Little boys who had no blood on them the following morning. But Dmac says so.
Why don't you post your proof for all your say sos? Don't be coming over here screaming your speculation, claiming it's fact, & insulting us.
Go ahead, make an actual post including the measurements of the three knives and point out which wounds couldn't possibly have been made by the two knives left in the cabin. Maybe then people will take you seriously.
In the meantime, your missing knife was sent off for DNA testing, was it not? Is it safe to assume there was nothing found on it connecting it your claims?
The two knives left at the scene were determined to be used in the murders. It's mentioned in the evidence audio tapes and newspaper reports.
You cannot judge if a specific knife made a specific wound based photographs or even measurements alone. Smaller knives can create larger wounds and larger wounds can even creat smaller wounds. It depends on the wounds location within Langer Lines on the body. Skin elasticity and direction the wound was inflicted need to be taken into account.
|
|
akat
Junior Member
Posts: 50
|
Post by akat on Sept 3, 2023 0:07:05 GMT
If those CHILDREN had been forced to use that steak knife, why weren’t they covered in blood? Where’s their bloody clothes? Where’s the cuts on their hands from the stabs they were supposedly forced to make with that cheap knife that didn’t have a hilt? Where are their finger prints on it? Where is any proof those CHILDREN did any of the things that forum says they did?
|
|
|
Post by snoho17 on Sept 3, 2023 6:53:16 GMT
Amen! There's No way children were woken in the middle of the night, forced to walk around a murder scene, stab some bodies so they wouldn't talk about it, and not transfer blood to their bed clothes, blankets, or sheets. I don't know how this can be both an ingenious mob hit, and a murder committed by morons at the same time.No way a "professional" hit man uses kids, and trusts them to keep their mouths shut. So add 14yo Sheila as such a terrifying figure that Justin even now is too scared to come forward. At what point do you admit those Zebra hooves you're hearing are just horses?
|
|
|
Post by snoho17 on Sept 3, 2023 6:59:19 GMT
Or maybe the jenous killers brought spare sheets and PJs, maybe they hung out after and forced the kids to shower, having hidden Tina's body in a ravine until helicopters were flying overhead and searchers out looking. Lol, sound crazy enough to fit "The Great Solve"?
|
|