|
Post by snoho17 on May 1, 2023 21:13:09 GMT
""Whoever did this stabbed the victims so violently they bent one knife totally double from the force," said Sheriff's Patrol Commander Rod DeCrona. "They stabbed and pounded on everything in sight -- the walls, the people, the furniture. Everything." He shuddered at the memory of first walking into the murder scene. "There was blood sprayed absolutely everywhere," DeCrona said. "You knew right away we were involved with a psychopath."
|
|
|
Post by snoho17 on May 1, 2023 21:30:10 GMT
Wondering if he's talking about the slash in the couch cushion, did someone try to shield themselves with it?
|
|
|
Post by Hope on May 2, 2023 13:37:02 GMT
Omg snoho, I read that same statement yesterday and thought about the cut in the couch cushion too! DeCrona has been criticized over that interview. But it was violent scene, especially for a small town dept like PCSO who had never experienced a crime of such magnitude.
We aren't privy to every detail and PCSO didn't do a perfect job with their documentation. For instance that couch cushion, the slash in it isn't documented anywhere. The knife marks in the wall are unusual, we know they were there, but not much documented based on what we've seen. It does seem possible there was more damage to furniture items than we are unaware of.
Before the original officers were decided to be corrupt assholes, locals spoke about how traumatizing this case was to them. How many of them young men themselves and never experienced anything like this. DeCrona may not be listed as an early investigator per the case files. However, that doesn't mean he didn't visit the scene at some point after the victims were removed. He was a deputy at the time. And at the very least he later investigated the case, had access to all the case files and photos, and heard everything those at the scene that morning had to say about it.
If I remember correctly DeCrona said the writer of that article exaggerated his comments, however, it's not far off imo.
|
|
|
Post by snoho17 on Jun 24, 2023 5:48:46 GMT
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Jun 24, 2023 21:51:32 GMT
Did the writer of that article exaggerate his comments or did DeCorona exaggerate his comments then try to backtrack?
LE documented the “stab” marks on the walls and from their documentation it doesn’t appear to be anything like DeCorona said - plus who knows how long these marks had been on the walls? I think LE checked the walls after Justin claimed the killer left a knife stuck in the wall - but if the knife was not still stuck in the wall when LE arrived at the CS then what happened to the knife? Did Justin remove it or did he stab the wall with the knife himself (thinking of the bent knife on the floor near Johnny)
*** After writing this post I kept thinking of Justin saying he saw a knife sticking out of the wall, but I also remembered it being said the killer returned and took the knife out of the wall so I searched and searched and never located Justin's actual interview of the knife in the wall just a statement written when Don returned to look for the knife marks. But I finally remembered where I'd read that:
Mike Gamberg statment in the 2018 Plumas News article:
So when Stoy returned to 28 was it to see if the knife could have been left stuck in the wall (when the killer left? then possibly removed by Justin?).
The more I research the more Justin's ever changing stories just add up to him being absolutely untruthful. That's why he couldn't keep his stories straight. Stoy said Justin could not see what he claimed to have seen in the living room from the boys bedroom and Justin told of trying to stop the bleeding on Sue and it was documented that this was known only by the officers because Sue's gown was covering it up (so did Justin lift her gown up with her bound wrists in the way?? Or did he see it because her gown was up over her breast and he was able to pull the gown down with her bound wrists in the way??) His stories make absolutely no sense. He didn't see Tina - he did see Tina etc....
There's some great thoughts that could explain away his different stories but how many times should his stories be "explained away"? The simple fact that he couldn't keep his stories straight certainly was a red flag to LE (that obviously did not point to Marty).
Sorry I got off track with this topic!!
|
|
|
Post by snoho17 on Jun 25, 2023 7:59:12 GMT
I'm loving your post for several reasons. First off your right, we don't know how long those marks were there. Also, I'd totally spaced that Justin said the man returned for the knife in the wall. " Did Justin remove it or did he stab the wall with the knife himself (thinking of the bent knife on the floor near Johnny" I've wondered that too. But think the same as you about Justin, we'll refer back to his statements when we see something that could line up, but at the same time know we kinda have to disregard his statements. He has some oddly specific observations, the design in the boots of one killer, being able to describe the shape of their eyes behind sun glasses, stuff like that. Things a person could only notice standing face to face with someone. But in all the chaos, whilst hiding, he catches all this? And then he's very vague about what he hears. "john argued with the killers" ok, what was said? The guy said "Sue", well what prompted that? What prompted that was Thomas's questioning IMO. In the situation Justin claimed, he should have heard more than he saw, again IMO. I get they needed to learn as much as they could as soon as they could, but with 20/20 vision the first person to ask questions should have been a person specialized in talking to children.
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Jun 25, 2023 14:05:17 GMT
For 1981 I think LE did a really good job of trying to get to the bottom of Justin's stories. Thanks to Hope for writing out a timeline for Justin - I'm gonna post the short version.
4-12-81 Justin tells Shaver he didn't see or hear anything
4-13-81 Marilyn brings Justin into the SO and he, once again, says he didn't see or hear anything Marilyn is interviewed by Crim & Bradley and tells them what Justin has been telling her about the murders Justin is interviewed by DT, Crim & Bradley
4-14-81 Justin is interviewed by DT, Crim & Bradley and tells about his dream and tells them things like cut on Sue's chest that only investigating officers knew about and describing killers
4-15-81 11:11am (3 days after murders) DT flies to Reno to p/u sketch artist Harlan Embrey and brings him back to Quincy 14:10am (3 hours later)Justin is place under hypnosis with Bradley present and Embrey draws a sketch
4-16-81 Justin is taken into protective custody for his safety
4-20-81 DOJ Agent Leonard speaks with Alfred French about Justin
4-21-81 11:45am Justin is p/u from school by DT and taken to lunch then Justin is polygraphed by Sam Lister 14:30am Lister requests that DT sit in on Justin's interview - Justin admits this was not a dream but he witness what happened Don Stoy takes Justin's shoes into possession and finds no traces of blood
4-22-81 Don Stoy goes to 28 to look for knife marks as referenced in Justin's interview
4-30-81 Don Stoy returns to 28 and confirms it is physically impossible to see the kitchen from the spot Justin claims to have seen it in from the boys room
5-12-81 DT consults with child psychologist Martin Reiser regarding Justin's statements and Marty - Reiser recommends Dr. Jerry Dash who agrees to come to Quincy on 5-19-81
5-19-81 8:15am Dr. Dash arrives 10:15am Dr. Dash hypnotizes Justin - this is taped and video recorded Dr. Dash thinks it's very likely Justin did see some things and suggests that the composite sketches be released
7-8-81 Justin is shown a photo lineup with Henry Thompson but does not identify any of the me as being in the cabin that night
9-18-81 Justin is shown photo lineup with 6 suspects he says Steve McKim looks a lot like the suspect
12-17-86 Justin is interveiwed by Decrona but information of this interview has not been released
5-22-14 After a recent news article Justin contacts Gamberg at the SO and is interviewed and gives a DNA sample
6-30-14 Justin's DNA sample sent to DOJ in Chico for processing
7-25-14 Meghan Gray from the Chico lab reports a possible match in Keddie homicides
10-24-14 Gamberg attempts to get helpfrom a criminal psychologist in how to best approach Justin
3-22-16 Gamberg informs Justin of DNA match and Justin is interviewed
***If Justin was a problemed child before and after the murders, as has been stated, then I would like to think he was given some kind of counseling during DT's time at PCSO. I know DT left soon after Justin went to stay with Joan in Meadow Valley and he really seemed like the one trying to help Justin (Marilyn said he didn't receive counseling because he went to live with his father and his father didn't believe in it - but that doesn't answer the question of was he in counseling with anyone right after the murders - I would be surprised to know he wasn't).
|
|
|
Post by kmik on Jul 7, 2023 4:37:30 GMT
Just going over Justin’s stories again. On Sunday and Monday he’s telling LE he didn’t see anything but Marilyn is telling Crim & Bradley on Monday what he came home and told them - before the info was known. According to her he claimed to have seen inside the front door from the fence between the Sharps and Seabolts.
He claimed Johnny was trying to protect his mother but doesn’t say who he was protecting her from. He claimed for 2 days he didn’t see anything. Then I’m guessing after Marilyn talked to Crim and Bradley he knew he better come up with something. I’ve always thought he claimed he looked out of the bedroom door and saw Tina dragging a blanket saying what’s going on but I now think he asked what was going on - the men grabbed Tina etc…
I do think Justin knows what happened. Reading back over the “dmac version “ of his 2016 interview with Gamberg says a lot. One thing he said was he couldn’t remember Keddie at all and “were repressed memories to come out people would say he knew it all along and had been lying” which is what I’ve thought for a long time was why he’s never told the truth. He said his mind put this to rest so many years.
He’s not talking about covering for Marty - Mike gave him every opportunity to name Marty (who’s been dead for decades ) yet he doesn’t. I do believe he knows what happened
|
|