Post by Hope on May 16, 2023 23:23:19 GMT
I was watching the Peacock series "Who Killed Robert Wone" and one of the interviewees brought up something we've talked about here. That is how the more people involved in a crime the higher the solve rate. Someone's always going to talk, someone's going to feel guilty, someone's going to be the weak link. And these statistics typically pertain to just 2-3 perpetrators.
Glenn Kirchner, Fmr. Federal Prosecutor:
"Ordinarily when you get two people involved in a crime you're typically going to be able to break one and figure out what happened. You get three people involved in a crime, you're almost certainly going to be able to get one of them to turn against the other two".
If the above is true with 2-3 perpetrators, what are the chances 12+ people could participate in a quadruple homicide and not one person talk? < 0% I'd say. Even less likely if a 14 year old girl and teenage boys were involved in the planning and little boys were forced to participate. The chances MMBDTSNRWBJRLM (did I miss anyone!?) conspired together to commit these murders is beyond implausible. That's not even including the countless DOJ, FBI and PCSO officers accused of some elaborate make believe co
The prevailing theory is utterly ridiculous and completely impossible imo. Not even remotely possible. These are real people and real lives being affected. It is one thing to have a theory or speculate, but even that has real life implications. It is next level, foul, unacceptable to claim you solved a case because you have a theory. To accuse, slander, harass the people you believe are responsible. To distort the facts, cherry pick the information the public has access to, to be a gatekeeper, protecting your theory and ego. While you're out there ruining lives those actually responsible, if still alive, are kicking back and laughing. You've made it so easy for them to get away with this. In the meantime families still hurt and live without answers. No justice for the victims. Shame on Mike Gamberg for his part in all this. Too bad those book plans fell through btw 🙄
To everyone interested in this case please do your own research. Don't believe everything you read. Read everything in its original form, in it's entirety. Just because someone is the loudest doesn't mean he is right. Just because someone else is smart enough to not interact with the crazy doesn't mean they aren't doing things to help move this case forward.
Anyway, here are some interesting statistics. Source: Homicide Trends in the US 1980-2008
Multiple Offender/Multiple Victims 1:
Multiple Offender/Multiple Victims 2:
Homicide Types by City:
Homicide Types by City - Clearance Rates:
Few Homicides Involve Multiple Offenders and Even Fewer Involve Multiple Victims:
Percentage with homicides with multiple offenders & Victims:
Victims per homicide incident percentage:
Victims per Homicide Incident Numbers:
Two or More Victims:
Rural vs Urban
Rural vs urban Intimate Homicides:
City Size Urban vs Rural Intimate vs Non Intimate:
Data sources:
Glenn Kirchner, Fmr. Federal Prosecutor:
"Ordinarily when you get two people involved in a crime you're typically going to be able to break one and figure out what happened. You get three people involved in a crime, you're almost certainly going to be able to get one of them to turn against the other two".
If the above is true with 2-3 perpetrators, what are the chances 12+ people could participate in a quadruple homicide and not one person talk? < 0% I'd say. Even less likely if a 14 year old girl and teenage boys were involved in the planning and little boys were forced to participate. The chances MMBDTSNRWBJRLM (did I miss anyone!?) conspired together to commit these murders is beyond implausible. That's not even including the countless DOJ, FBI and PCSO officers accused of some elaborate make believe co
The prevailing theory is utterly ridiculous and completely impossible imo. Not even remotely possible. These are real people and real lives being affected. It is one thing to have a theory or speculate, but even that has real life implications. It is next level, foul, unacceptable to claim you solved a case because you have a theory. To accuse, slander, harass the people you believe are responsible. To distort the facts, cherry pick the information the public has access to, to be a gatekeeper, protecting your theory and ego. While you're out there ruining lives those actually responsible, if still alive, are kicking back and laughing. You've made it so easy for them to get away with this. In the meantime families still hurt and live without answers. No justice for the victims. Shame on Mike Gamberg for his part in all this. Too bad those book plans fell through btw 🙄
To everyone interested in this case please do your own research. Don't believe everything you read. Read everything in its original form, in it's entirety. Just because someone is the loudest doesn't mean he is right. Just because someone else is smart enough to not interact with the crazy doesn't mean they aren't doing things to help move this case forward.
Anyway, here are some interesting statistics. Source: Homicide Trends in the US 1980-2008
Multiple Offender/Multiple Victims 1:
Multiple Offender/Multiple Victims 2:
Homicide Types by City:
Homicide Types by City - Clearance Rates:
Few Homicides Involve Multiple Offenders and Even Fewer Involve Multiple Victims:
Percentage with homicides with multiple offenders & Victims:
Victims per homicide incident percentage:
Victims per Homicide Incident Numbers:
Two or More Victims:
Rural vs Urban
Rural vs urban Intimate Homicides:
City Size Urban vs Rural Intimate vs Non Intimate:
Data sources:
