The Yardarm Light was Actually Unscrewed, Not the Porch
Nov 30, 2023 12:55:41 GMT
snoho17 likes this
Post by Hope on Nov 30, 2023 12:55:41 GMT
Porch light or Yardarm, which light bulb was unscrewed? What we know:
- Not one report has been produced which verifies the porch light bulb was found unscrewed
- There IS a report stating the yardarm light bulb had been unscrewed.
- There are no report stating the porch light bulb was screwed back in by PCSO on the morning of 4/12/81.
- Two prints were ID'd on the porch light bulb. One was identified as Sheila's. The other was too smeared for comparison.
- It was this smeared print that k28 now claims was Wright's print
- Yet, no report has been published to prove his claim that Wright's prints were ID'd on the bulb.
- The initial report ID'd Sheila's print & stated the other print was too smeared for comparison purposes
- He then claimed to find a later report which ID'd the smeared print as Wrights
- He has since been unable to find this later report again, but "knows he saw it".
- ? Is he confused? Was what he saw actually the mention of Wright's prints being sent for elimination along with the light bulb?
- Crime scene photos show the porch light on that morning.
- The yardarm light does not appear on in the available photos.
What we are left with is zero documentation confirming the porch light had been unscrewed. Definitely zero documentation Officer Wright screwed the light bulb back in. And zero documentation Wright's print was ID'd on the bulb.
These things have all been invented by Dmac, built around Sheila's print being found on the porch light bulb. He has had documentation stating it was the yardarm light that was unscrewed, but decided not to disclose this. Not only that but he misrepresented the contents of Crim's report. He knowingly lied and put false information out there that the Crim report stated it was the porch light when the report clearly states it was the yardarm light. In his recent Facebook post he wrote "As for the report stating the yardarm bulb was unscrewed, no other report states this". Yet, he has never produced a single report corroborating his claim the porch light was unscrewed. He does have reports stating it was the yardarm light, just ignore that though so he can continue on falsely accusing Sheila of murder.
And this is why we should never believe a word out of keddie28's mouth without the original report to back it up.
K28 post made on October 30, 2023:
And his description of the same report 2 years ago:
Re: Sheila Had Her Family Slaughtered: The Light Bulb
Postby dmac » Wed Aug 11, 2021 11:39 am
Took me a while to find it, because I kept getting sidetracked... Here's the bit from Doug's private files, where he's trying to tie the Keddie case onto a serial rapist in Plumas County. Charles Edwin Wilkins had been busted for rape and burglary a few times, and was up on the same charges again in 84. Somehow, Crim had made note of the similarities (the Crim note is not found in his known files) between Wilkins' cases and the Keddie murders.
That both Crim and Thomas point out the front porch bulb was unscrewed in Keddie as part of the MO is huge, of course, because the prints on the bulb proves it was Sheila, and that she was in on the conspiracy. Although while the prints being Sheila's appears in several files, it's not found in files by Crimely, but Crim's clearly aware enough of the situation (that 28 was intentionally darkened for the murders) that he lists it as part of the Keddie murders MO. Of course, there's only a 99.9999999% likelihood Crim also knew the prints were Sheila's, but a 100% positive that DT knew, because the prints being Sheila's appears on his list of main worries about the crappy coverup he started.
So, LE KNEW THE UNSCREWED BULB AND DARKENING OF 28 WAS MODUS OPERENDI, AND KNEW SHEILA UNSCREWED THE BULB. AND DID NOTHING BUT BURY IT.
Looking at the rest of DT's words: Ron Pedrini is a suspect, so DT goes over some of his oddities... but, as I've already posted in the Pedrini Collection, nowhere near as many red flags as I've uncovered.
113-GAM-New-Ev.jpg
"Wilkins ties Vx with whatever is available (?)" The question mark to me can mean only one thing: PCSO and DOJ knew the killers brought the tape with them, so it's marked 'questionable' because it's not a similarity.
Then he mentions one Vx nightgown was lifted up the legs so Wilkins covered the Vx with a blanket. So was this a murder, or was the Vx unable to move because she was restrained? Any, the important point is DT asks if Justin's the one that pulled up Sue's nightgown. This means LE knew early on Justin covered Sue, but there's no indication this idiot saw the Bigger Picture: That it took TWO BOYS to move Sue, then cover her. Moreso, that the staging (hiking up of Sue's gown and staging her with her legs spread) was done by the killers, UNDONE by the boys. Instead, this jagoff jackass tries to attribute all of it to Justin.
You must be a member of the Keddie Forum with 15 approved posts to view the files attached to this post.
Postby dmac » Wed Aug 11, 2021 11:39 am
Took me a while to find it, because I kept getting sidetracked... Here's the bit from Doug's private files, where he's trying to tie the Keddie case onto a serial rapist in Plumas County. Charles Edwin Wilkins had been busted for rape and burglary a few times, and was up on the same charges again in 84. Somehow, Crim had made note of the similarities (the Crim note is not found in his known files) between Wilkins' cases and the Keddie murders.
That both Crim and Thomas point out the front porch bulb was unscrewed in Keddie as part of the MO is huge, of course, because the prints on the bulb proves it was Sheila, and that she was in on the conspiracy. Although while the prints being Sheila's appears in several files, it's not found in files by Crimely, but Crim's clearly aware enough of the situation (that 28 was intentionally darkened for the murders) that he lists it as part of the Keddie murders MO. Of course, there's only a 99.9999999% likelihood Crim also knew the prints were Sheila's, but a 100% positive that DT knew, because the prints being Sheila's appears on his list of main worries about the crappy coverup he started.
So, LE KNEW THE UNSCREWED BULB AND DARKENING OF 28 WAS MODUS OPERENDI, AND KNEW SHEILA UNSCREWED THE BULB. AND DID NOTHING BUT BURY IT.
Looking at the rest of DT's words: Ron Pedrini is a suspect, so DT goes over some of his oddities... but, as I've already posted in the Pedrini Collection, nowhere near as many red flags as I've uncovered.
113-GAM-New-Ev.jpg
"Wilkins ties Vx with whatever is available (?)" The question mark to me can mean only one thing: PCSO and DOJ knew the killers brought the tape with them, so it's marked 'questionable' because it's not a similarity.
Then he mentions one Vx nightgown was lifted up the legs so Wilkins covered the Vx with a blanket. So was this a murder, or was the Vx unable to move because she was restrained? Any, the important point is DT asks if Justin's the one that pulled up Sue's nightgown. This means LE knew early on Justin covered Sue, but there's no indication this idiot saw the Bigger Picture: That it took TWO BOYS to move Sue, then cover her. Moreso, that the staging (hiking up of Sue's gown and staging her with her legs spread) was done by the killers, UNDONE by the boys. Instead, this jagoff jackass tries to attribute all of it to Justin.
You must be a member of the Keddie Forum with 15 approved posts to view the files attached to this post.
Well busted in a lie here. Now we can see exactly why he didn't post the Crim report when he made this post back in 2021. Because he prefers to twist the truth. This is a perfect example, he knowingly claims Crims report states the front porch light was unscrewed. It most certainly does NOT. He is referencing the report he recently posted to Facebook which in fact states it was the yardarm light bulb which was unscrewed. Its obviously the same report because it contains the same info about Pedrini. Lie some more. You're only fucking with people's lives and preventing justice from being served to those really responsible. I bet the real killers love you.