Post by Hope on Oct 12, 2021 5:33:20 GMT
Another DNA hit that has been mentioned recently is the "minor female DNA" found on "brown electrical cord" and in the "killzone".
From Keddie28's Facebook page in 2020:
From a Keddie28 Newsletter in July 2021:
And finally this exchange with keddie28 from July 2021:
The truth is, this female DNA is not the way it is being portrayed. To say it belongs to Marilyn is simply 100% not true. We need to stick to the facts. It's not ok to manipulate evidence to fit a theory. To pass it off as something it is not.
The unknown female DNA profile found on the brown electrical cord was determined to belong to the previous Lab Technician who processed & contaminated it.
This is a quote from the actual DOJ DNA report:
"The female 9-locus short tandem repeat (STR) profile previously detected for the substrate control from the gray/white shirt (item 81ASC) and the female 7-locus partial STR profile detected for the swab from the brown cord with a male plug (item 78A) has been attributed to contamination of these items by the BFS Chico Laboratory Criminologist who performed the preliminary examination prior to the items being submitted to the BFS Jan Bashinksi Laboratory. Therefore the female STR profile that had been previously uploaded for search against profiles from offenders and case evidence has been deleted from the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS)."
The unkown female DNA identified on Sue's gag was also found to be consistent with the prior Criminologist's DNA profile and she could not be eliminated as the source.
"As previously reported, a mixture consistent with a combination of DNA from Glenna Sharp and a female low-level contributor was detected for the swab of the tape from Glenna Sharp's neck/gag (item GS2A-1). Senior Criminologist T.P. had previously reported that the minor alleles determined for this item are consistent with the female profile detected for item 81ASC. Therefore, the BFS Chico Laboratory Criminologist who performed the preliminary examination of the items submitted would not be eliminated as a possible contributor of the DNA detected for this mixture."
Although not previously mentioned, this section of the report is interesting. Another section of brown electrical cord (without the male plug), item 85A, was found to have a DNA mixture which includes at least one male contributor. It was also likely contaminated by the prior technician, but at least it appears to contain DNA from other individuals.
"As previously reported, a low-level mixture consistent with a combination of DNA from a female contributor, at least one male contributor, and a third low-level contributor was detected at eight STR loci for the swab of the brown electrical cord (item 85A). Senior Criminologist T.P. had previously determined that the female whose DNA was detected for item 78A could not be eliminated as a possible contributor of the DNA detected for this mixture. Therefore the BFS Chico Laboratory Criminologist who performed the preliminary examination of the items submitted would not be eliminated as a possible contributor of the DNA detected in this mixture."
It's possible a private lab, such as Othram Labs, could work with this sample. They specialize in advanced DNA testing using mixed, degraded, minutiae sample and their results are incredible; www.dnasolves.com
From Keddie28's Facebook page in 2020:
6 Sept-- Speaking of DNA, multiple reports show DNA found on Sue's bindings are consistent with Sue as well as a minor female contributor. I believe Loon bound the victims, at least Sue
From a Keddie28 Newsletter in July 2021:
Based on the unique knots used and DNA results, it appears Marty had help from Loon in tying ang gagging Sue. Loon applied the tape and panties layers of the gag, which explains the genesis of, and her involvement in, sexually humiliating Sue during staging.
And finally this exchange with keddie28 from July 2021:
zodiackillerhoax1986.freeforums.net/thread/486/kell1-websleuths-assessment?page=2
Post by druthers on Jul 31, 2021 at 9:45pm
There was no bra in the gag. What a mess. The ME was a mess! I've seen worse, but rarely. He couldn't say the sky is blue, he'd prefer to list every color it isn't. This is a major homicide case, and Tweedle Dee was tasked with being Tweedle Dumb.
This doesn't come from just the photos, but from the reports. First layer: BLUE BANDANA. Not red.
Second layer: Several strips of the med tape, with female DNA, indicating Marilyn applied the tape. However, if the DNA results came from Chico's lab, a female tech there contaminated Keddie evidence with her own DNA.
Third layer: Sue's UNDERPANTS, cut from her body and used for sexual degradation and humiliation. Again, questionable female DNA based on the same reasoning. Chico lab ruined unknown evidence from contamination.
Sue was a slut and porked any equally stupid dick within reach. The house was a disaster, Sue was the perfect NON-mommy. Sheila is clearly a murderer JUST for the lies she told about Sue, John, Dana, Tina. Sue brought murder into her house because she lived very stupidly and dangerously. That in no way makes it her fault. Except she may as well have been begging for it.
There was no bra in the gag. What a mess. The ME was a mess! I've seen worse, but rarely. He couldn't say the sky is blue, he'd prefer to list every color it isn't. This is a major homicide case, and Tweedle Dee was tasked with being Tweedle Dumb.
This doesn't come from just the photos, but from the reports. First layer: BLUE BANDANA. Not red.
Second layer: Several strips of the med tape, with female DNA, indicating Marilyn applied the tape. However, if the DNA results came from Chico's lab, a female tech there contaminated Keddie evidence with her own DNA.
Third layer: Sue's UNDERPANTS, cut from her body and used for sexual degradation and humiliation. Again, questionable female DNA based on the same reasoning. Chico lab ruined unknown evidence from contamination.
Post by hope on Jul 31, 2021 at 10:38pm
So female DNA equals Marilyn's DNA? Did the DNA match to her or was it only determined to be from a female? We know Marilyn gave a DNA sample, so was this sample from the gag matched to her DNA? Female does not equal Marilyn.
So female DNA equals Marilyn's DNA? Did the DNA match to her or was it only determined to be from a female? We know Marilyn gave a DNA sample, so was this sample from the gag matched to her DNA? Female does not equal Marilyn.
Post by druthers on Jul 31, 2021 at 10:42pm
I've said exactly what I meant, hopeless, senior nobody.
I've said exactly what I meant, hopeless, senior nobody.
The truth is, this female DNA is not the way it is being portrayed. To say it belongs to Marilyn is simply 100% not true. We need to stick to the facts. It's not ok to manipulate evidence to fit a theory. To pass it off as something it is not.
The unknown female DNA profile found on the brown electrical cord was determined to belong to the previous Lab Technician who processed & contaminated it.
This is a quote from the actual DOJ DNA report:
"The female 9-locus short tandem repeat (STR) profile previously detected for the substrate control from the gray/white shirt (item 81ASC) and the female 7-locus partial STR profile detected for the swab from the brown cord with a male plug (item 78A) has been attributed to contamination of these items by the BFS Chico Laboratory Criminologist who performed the preliminary examination prior to the items being submitted to the BFS Jan Bashinksi Laboratory. Therefore the female STR profile that had been previously uploaded for search against profiles from offenders and case evidence has been deleted from the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS)."
The unkown female DNA identified on Sue's gag was also found to be consistent with the prior Criminologist's DNA profile and she could not be eliminated as the source.
"As previously reported, a mixture consistent with a combination of DNA from Glenna Sharp and a female low-level contributor was detected for the swab of the tape from Glenna Sharp's neck/gag (item GS2A-1). Senior Criminologist T.P. had previously reported that the minor alleles determined for this item are consistent with the female profile detected for item 81ASC. Therefore, the BFS Chico Laboratory Criminologist who performed the preliminary examination of the items submitted would not be eliminated as a possible contributor of the DNA detected for this mixture."
Although not previously mentioned, this section of the report is interesting. Another section of brown electrical cord (without the male plug), item 85A, was found to have a DNA mixture which includes at least one male contributor. It was also likely contaminated by the prior technician, but at least it appears to contain DNA from other individuals.
"As previously reported, a low-level mixture consistent with a combination of DNA from a female contributor, at least one male contributor, and a third low-level contributor was detected at eight STR loci for the swab of the brown electrical cord (item 85A). Senior Criminologist T.P. had previously determined that the female whose DNA was detected for item 78A could not be eliminated as a possible contributor of the DNA detected for this mixture. Therefore the BFS Chico Laboratory Criminologist who performed the preliminary examination of the items submitted would not be eliminated as a possible contributor of the DNA detected in this mixture."
It's possible a private lab, such as Othram Labs, could work with this sample. They specialize in advanced DNA testing using mixed, degraded, minutiae sample and their results are incredible; www.dnasolves.com